Ìý
Cases Study Sources
-
- Systematic falsification and manipulation of data and analysis.Ìý
- Public and private incentives for doing science with integrity.Ìý
- Interrelationship between conduct of principal investigator and colleagues.
-
- Popularity and ‘hot’ fields exaggerating dissemination of results.
- Issues of replicability.
- Scientific findings being used in policy.
-
- Incentives and best practices for authorship.
- Division of labor and responsibilities between student and faculty.
- Annotated commentary
-
- Collection of cases pp. 229
- Of interest: Case 27 Profits and Professors pp. 267
- Of interest: Case 35 Service Learning pp. 273
-
- Procurement of sensitive scientific materials: human eggs.
- Importance of thorough informed consent.
- Incentives for major breakthroughs vs. rigor and prudence.
-
- Corporate incentives and doing good science.
- Role of publishing as intermediary and bottleneck.
- Importance of critique and rebuttal.
-
- Collection of cases from National Academies
- Of interest: Changing Knowledge pp. 13
- Of interest: Treatment of Misconduct pp. 21
-
- Fabrication, falsification and informed consent key issues.
- Majority are from bioethics.